News

Ohio Supreme Court Strengthens Voluntary Abandonment Defense in the Workers’ Compensation Area

If an employee fails to fulfill some of the fundamental requirements and duties of their job and they are terminated for those deficiencies, shouldn’t that be enough to constitute voluntary abandonment? In order for an employment discharge to qualify as voluntary abandonment, the law requires proof that: (1) there is a written work rule that […]

Ohio Supreme Court Strengthens Voluntary Abandonment Defense in the Workers’ Compensation Area Read More »

Court of Appeals Overturns Jury Award of Over $700,000 Based on Fellow Employee Immunity

Recently, the Fourth District Court of Appeals overturned a jury award of more than $700,000 to a plaintiff involved in a car accident at work.  Bungard v. Jeffers  (Ohio App. 4 Dist., January 28, 2014, 2014-Ohio-334). In Bungard, the plaintiff filed a negligence suit against his coworker, Steven Jeffers, after his car was rear-ended in

Court of Appeals Overturns Jury Award of Over $700,000 Based on Fellow Employee Immunity Read More »

Trio of Ohio Supreme Court Cases Illuminate Abandonment of Workforce as Bar to Disability Compensation

Three recent Ohio Supreme Court cases have addressed the effect of voluntary retirement or job market abandonment on eligibility for disability compensation.  State ex rel. Hoffman v. Rexam Beverage Can Co. (October 16, 2013, No. 2013-Ohio-4538); State ex rel. Black v. Indus. Comm. (October 17, 2013, No. 2013-Ohio-4550); State ex rel. Kelsey Hayes Co. v. Grashel (November 14, 2013, No. 2013-Ohio-4959). 

Trio of Ohio Supreme Court Cases Illuminate Abandonment of Workforce as Bar to Disability Compensation Read More »

Inconsistent Application of Company Policies Can Lead to Trouble and Discrimination Litigation

In a recent opinion, the Tenth District Court of Appeals emphasized again how important it is for employers to make sure that their company policies and disciplinary actions are applied consistently and fairly to all employees.  Bowditch v. Mettler Toledo International, Inc. (Ohio App 10th Dist. 2013), 2013-Ohio-4206.  In the Bowditch case, an employee in his 50’s was terminated when

Inconsistent Application of Company Policies Can Lead to Trouble and Discrimination Litigation Read More »

Termination for Criminal Conduct May Not Bar Recovery of Workers’ Compensation Benefits

Under the defense of voluntary abandonment, an employer can block a claimant’s eligibility for future temporary total disability benefits if the employer can show that the claimant was terminated for violating a written work rule or policy. The job abandonment is deemed to be voluntary if three main tests for the use of this defense

Termination for Criminal Conduct May Not Bar Recovery of Workers’ Compensation Benefits Read More »

Ohio Supreme Court Rules that BWC is Not Under Duty to Pay Scheduled Loss of Use Benefits in Absence of Application

On September 18, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed a court of appeals decision finding that the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) was not required to award scheduled loss of use benefits during an injured worker’s lifetime when no application was filed.  Additionally, the Court ruled that after the injured worker’s death, scheduled loss benefits

Ohio Supreme Court Rules that BWC is Not Under Duty to Pay Scheduled Loss of Use Benefits in Absence of Application Read More »

Failure to List All Allowed Conditions in the Header of a Report Does Not Necessarily Disqualify the Report from Consideration by the Industrial Commission

The fact that an examining doctor does not list all of the allowed conditions in the header of his or her report does not necessarily mean that the report will be rejected by the Industrial Commission.  To the contrary, the Tenth District Court of Appeals has now held that so long as the doctor indicated

Failure to List All Allowed Conditions in the Header of a Report Does Not Necessarily Disqualify the Report from Consideration by the Industrial Commission Read More »

Ohio Supreme Court Limits Recognition of Psychiatric Condition in Workers’ Compensation Claim

The Ohio Supreme Court recently limited the opportunity under Ohio’s workers’ compensation laws for the allowance of psychiatric conditions.  Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co. (June 14, 2013), 2011-Ohio-708.  In order to recover for a psychiatric condition in Ohio, the Supreme Court held that there must be proof of a direct and proximate causal relationship between the

Ohio Supreme Court Limits Recognition of Psychiatric Condition in Workers’ Compensation Claim Read More »

Defective Safety Devices Can Lead to Liability Under an Employer Intentional Tort Claim

Even with the significant protections set forth in Ohio Revised Code Section 2745.01, employers still face potential liability in an intentional tort action if a safety device malfunctions or is disconnected.  Subsections (A) and (B) of the statute establish that an employer can only be held liable for an intentional tort if it acted with

Defective Safety Devices Can Lead to Liability Under an Employer Intentional Tort Claim Read More »

Governor and BWC Announce Proposal to Pay $1 Billion Back

Governor Kasich and the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC), Steve Buehrer, recently announced a proposal to pay $1 billion in rebates to private employers and public-taxing districts that pay into Ohio’s workers’ compensation system. Under this proposal, about 210,000 private businesses and public entities would receive approximately 56% of their annual premium

Governor and BWC Announce Proposal to Pay $1 Billion Back Read More »

Employees that are Required to Travel as Part of their Normal Work Assignments Expand Workers’ Compensation Liability Exposure

If an employer is going to require an employee to travel as part of his or her regular job duties and is compensating that individual for their travel time, then the employer can expect to see expanded workers’ compensation liability for that employee.  For instance, if the employee is injured while traveling to see a

Employees that are Required to Travel as Part of their Normal Work Assignments Expand Workers’ Compensation Liability Exposure Read More »