News

Statutory Subrogee’s Subrogation Claim Governed by Six Year Statute of Limitations

So, how long does a self-insured employer have to file an action against a third party to recover the workers compensation benefits it paid to an employee injured by the third party? A recent Ohio Supreme Court case says the employer can wait up to 6 years! The Ohio Revised Code provides that if a […]

Statutory Subrogee’s Subrogation Claim Governed by Six Year Statute of Limitations Read More »

Labor Department to Issue Proposed Rule Extending Protection to Home Care Workers

On December 15, 2011, President Obama and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis announced that the Labor Department will soon issue a proposed rule that would limit the “companionship services” exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  The proposed rule will likely be published within two weeks. The FLSA currently exempts workers who provide “companionship services”

Labor Department to Issue Proposed Rule Extending Protection to Home Care Workers Read More »

Ohio Supreme Court Refuses to Recognize a Claim for Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy when an Employee is Fired after Complaining about Fire Safety

In the case of Dohme v. Eurand America, Inc. (2011), Ohio St.3d 168, the Ohio Supreme Court again emphasized what is required to establish a claim for wrongful discharge in violation of a public policy.  In order to succeed on this type of claim a terminated employee must articulate a clear public policy that has been violated. 

Ohio Supreme Court Refuses to Recognize a Claim for Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy when an Employee is Fired after Complaining about Fire Safety Read More »

Beware: EPLI Policies Don’t Always Cover Claims Brought by the EEOC

In a recent ruling by a federal district court in Tennessee, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. was denied reimbursement under its employment practices liability insurance (“EPLI”) policy for a settlement it had reached in a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (”EEOC”).  In the case of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v.

Beware: EPLI Policies Don’t Always Cover Claims Brought by the EEOC Read More »

Indemnification Provisions – Always Remember to Check the Indemnity Clause of any Contract You Sign with a Third Party Vendor or Subcontractor to Ensure You are Protected

With a carefully worded indemnification clause, the owner or general contractor on a construction project should be entitled to indemnification in a lawsuit brought by an employee of a subcontractor or vendor who is injured on the job. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently upheld an award of attorneys’ fees and

Indemnification Provisions – Always Remember to Check the Indemnity Clause of any Contract You Sign with a Third Party Vendor or Subcontractor to Ensure You are Protected Read More »

Sixth Circuit Confirms that Sexual Orientation Is Not a Prohibited Basis for Discrimination Under Title VII

In the case of Gilbert v. Country Music Association, Inc., 112 Fep. Cases 1711, Case No. 09-6398 (August 2, 2011), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a previous dismissal of a plaintiff’s claim for discrimination based upon his open homosexuality.  The Plaintiff, Marty Gilbert, had acquired a job through his local union

Sixth Circuit Confirms that Sexual Orientation Is Not a Prohibited Basis for Discrimination Under Title VII Read More »

NLRB Posting Requirement Delayed

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has announced that it will delay the implementation of its posting requirement rule until January 31, 2012.  The NLRB came under significant political and legal pressure after announcing the new posting requirement, which was originally set to go into effect on November 14, 2011.  The new rule required all

NLRB Posting Requirement Delayed Read More »

Repetitive Use Claims Require Specific Evidence of Repetitive Activity and Medical Causation; Claimant Can Recover Deposition Costs Even If He Loses at Trial

According to the Tenth District Court of Appeals, (Reichard v. R J. Wheels, Inc., 193 Ohio App.3d 334, 2011-Ohio-1597), in order for a claimant to prove a repetitive use type workers’ compensation injury the claimant must present evidence establishing repetitive use type activities or tasks on the job and medical evidence must then be presented

Repetitive Use Claims Require Specific Evidence of Repetitive Activity and Medical Causation; Claimant Can Recover Deposition Costs Even If He Loses at Trial Read More »

Wellness Programs Could Be Unintended Traps For GINA and ADA Violations

Employers that establish wellness programs and offer financial inducements for employees to participate could find themselves in trouble with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act (GINA). In a letter issued by the EEOC in June, it was noted that while Title I

Wellness Programs Could Be Unintended Traps For GINA and ADA Violations Read More »

Ohio’s Tort Reform Provisions Apply to Retaliatory Discharge Actions

In an appeal from the largest retaliatory discharge jury award in Ohio history (over $46 million), the Eighth District Court of Appeals of Ohio was asked to consider whether certain provisions of Ohio’s tort reform statutes should apply to limit the recovery.  Luri v. Republic Services (Ohio App. 8 Dist. 2011), 193 Ohio App.3d 682. In Luri,

Ohio’s Tort Reform Provisions Apply to Retaliatory Discharge Actions Read More »